{"id":3728,"date":"2017-11-13T09:56:19","date_gmt":"2017-11-13T07:56:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/?p=3728"},"modified":"2024-10-24T18:52:07","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T16:52:07","slug":"recenzare-peer-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/recenzare-peer-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Recenzare \/ Peer-Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Algoritmul recenz\u0103rii:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Se analizeaz\u0103 modul de respectare a recomand\u0103rilor de tehnoredactare pentru autori. \u00cen cazul nerespect\u0103rii acestora, articolul se returneaz\u0103 autorilor pentru remedierea neregulilor constatate.<\/li>\n
  2. Articolele care au primit confirmarea de acceptare din partea Comitetului de redac\u0163ie sunt repartizate de redactorul-\u015fef spre evaluare, la doi referen\u0163i \u015ftiin\u0163ifici, \u00een func\u0163ie de problematica \u015fi spa\u0163iul geopolitic pentru care referen\u0163ii de\u0163in expertiz\u0103. Identitatea autorilor nu se face cunoscuta evaluatorilor.<\/li>\n
  3. Referen\u0163ii \u015ftiin\u0163ifici analizeaz\u0103 articolele primite, pe baza grilei de evaluare elaborat\u0103 de Comitetul \u015ftiin\u0163ific al revistei, conform modelului urm\u0103tor:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Criterii de evaluare<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

    Punctaj<\/h1>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    5<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n3<\/strong><\/td>\n2<\/strong><\/td>\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Noutatea temei propuse<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Corectitudinea utiliz\u0103rii aparatului critic<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Originalitatea rezolv\u0103rii problemelor abordate<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Actualitatea \u015fi utilitatea solu\u0163iilor prezentate<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Claritatea, concizia \u015fi acurate\u0163ea exprim\u0103rilor<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Utilizarea corect\u0103 a limbajului de specialitate<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Relevan\u0163a surselor bibliografice<\/strong><\/p>\n

     <\/td>\n

    		<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

     <\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Rezultatele evalu\u0103rilor sunt transmise responsabilului pentru fiecare num\u0103r, stabilit de c\u0103tre redactorul-\u015fef.<\/li>\n
    2. Articolele care au primit aviz favorabil din partea referen\u0163ilor stiin\u0163ifici, prin grija responsabilului de num\u0103r, devin propuneri pentru cuprinsul orientativ al num\u0103rului respectiv. Sugestiile referen\u0163ilor \u015ftiintifici pentru articolele care nu r\u0103spund exigen\u0163elor \u015ftiin\u0163ifice sunt transmise autorilor, prin grija responsabilului de num\u0103r, \u00een vederea remedierii aspectelor constatate. Dac\u0103 ace\u015fti autori refac articolele, acestea sunt reintroduse \u00een procesul de evaluare, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu punctul 1.<\/li>\n
    3. Comitetul de redac\u0163ie analizeaz\u0103 \u015fi stabile\u015fte articolele care fac obiectul apari\u0163iei \u00een viitorul num\u0103r al revistei, pe baza propunerilor responsabilului de num\u0103r.<\/li>\n
    4. Redactorul-\u015fef prezint\u0103 Comitetului \u015ftiin\u0163ific propunerile pentru viitorul num\u0103r, iar acesta hot\u0103r\u0103\u015fte forma \u015fi con\u0163inutul final, \u00een func\u0163ie de punctajele stabilite de c\u0103tre evaluatori, \u00een ordine descresc\u0103toare.<\/li>\n
    5. \u00cen baza acestei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri, responsabilul de num\u0103r \u00eempreun\u0103 cu redactorul-\u015fef coordoneaz\u0103 apari\u0163ia \u015fi difuzarea revistei.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u00cen mod obligatoriu, autorii care au transmis articole vor primi r\u0103spuns pe una dintre urm\u0103toarele variante:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. acceptarea lucr\u0103rii \u00een forma trimis\u0103;<\/li>\n
      2. acceptarea lucr\u0103rii cu minime corecturi;<\/li>\n
      3. acceptarea lucr\u0103rii \u00een condi\u0163iile \u00eendeplinirii revizuirilor propuse de c\u0103tre evaluatori;<\/li>\n
      4. respingerea lucr\u0103rii.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

         <\/p>\n

        The Algorithm of Evaluation:<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. It examines the compliance with the recommendations for authors. In case of non-compliance of their article, the authors will receive article in order to remedy the deficiencies.<\/li>\n
        2. Articles that have received confirmation of acceptance from the editorial board are distributed for evaluation, by chief editor, to two scientific reviewers, depending on security issues and geopolitical space for which reviewers have expertise. Author\u2019s identity is not known by reviewers; reviewer\u2019s identity is not known by authors (\u201ddouble-blind procedure\u201d).<\/li>\n
        3. Scientific reviewers analyze received papers, based on the evaluation grid developed by the Scientific Committee, as follows:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

           <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
          Evaluation Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

          Scores<\/h1>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

          5<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n3<\/strong><\/td>\n2<\/strong><\/td>\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          The novelty of the proposed theme<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Correct use bibliographic notes and bibliography<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Originality solving addressed problems<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Actuality and utility of presented solutions<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Clarity, brevity and accuracy of the expressions<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Proper use of specialized language<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          Relevant bibliographic sources<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

           <\/p>\n

            \n
          1. The results of evaluations are transmitted to responsible for each number, established by the chief editor.<\/li>\n
          2. Articles that have received positive resolution from the scientific referees becomes proposals for the content of the current issue. Scientific referee\u2019s suggestions for articles that do not respond scientific requirements are sent to authors by the current issue responsible care, to correct identified problems. If these authors recover the items, they are returned in the evaluation process, starting with point 1.<\/li>\n
          3. Editorial Board consider and determine articles accepted in the next issue of magazine, based on proposals of the current issue responsible.<\/li>\n
          4. The chief editor presents the Scientific Committee proposals for the current issue, and Scientific Committee finally decides the form and content, according to the scores established by the evaluators, in descending order.<\/li>\n
          5. Based on this decision, the current issue responsible together with the chief editor coordinates magazine publication and distribution.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Mandatory, the authors who submitted articles will\u00a0receive answer on one of the following:<\/em><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Acceptance of the paper in the sent version;<\/li>\n
            2. Acceptance of the paper with minimal corrections;<\/li>\n
            3. Acceptance of the paper under the conditions proposed by the evaluators;<\/li>\n
            4. Rejection of the paper.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

               <\/p>\n

              \n

               <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              Algoritmul recenz\u0103rii: Se analizeaz\u0103 modul de respectare a recomand\u0103rilor de tehnoredactare pentru autori. \u00cen cazul nerespect\u0103rii acestora, articolul se returneaz\u0103 autorilor pentru remedierea neregulilor constatate. Articolele care au primit confirmarea de acceptare din partea Comitetului de redac\u0163ie sunt repartizate de redactorul-\u015fef spre evaluare, la doi referen\u0163i \u015ftiin\u0163ifici, \u00een func\u0163ie de problematica \u015fi spa\u0163iul geopolitic pentru…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3728"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11492,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3728\/revisions\/11492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centers.ulbsibiu.ro\/ccsprise\/lact\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}